Classification of Elements and Periodicity in Properties · Lesson 5 of 10
Atomic and Ionic Size
“Explain size trends by balancing nuclear attraction, shielding, shell number, and electron repulsion.”
• Distinguish covalent, metallic, and non-bonded measures of atomic size. • Calculate a radius from an appropriate internuclear distance. • Explain atomic-radius trends across periods and down groups. • Compare atoms with their cations and anions. • Order isoelectronic species using nuclear charge.
What does the radius of an atom mean?
A solid ball has a surface where it ends. An atom’s electron cloud has no comparable sharp edge: the probability of finding an electron gradually becomes small farther from the nucleus. Atomic radius is therefore an operational measure inferred from distances between neighbouring atoms, not a direct measurement of a hard boundary.
Many physical quantities, including melting and boiling points, heats of fusion and vaporisation, and atomization energies, can vary periodically. This chapter develops a selected set of atomic properties in detail because they help explain chemical behaviour. We begin with size, then connect it to the energy of removing or adding electrons.
Atoms are also extremely small. A representative atomic radius is of order , or about one ångström. The picometre is convenient for tabulating atomic distances: and . The exact assigned radius depends on how the neighbouring atoms interact.
For two identical atoms joined by a single covalent bond, half the distance between their nuclei. This gives a useful measure of atomic size in that bonding situation.
Half the internuclear distance between neighbouring atoms in a metallic crystal. It is a measure appropriate to metallic bonding.
For either of these particular equal-atom situations, the measured separation is shared equally between the two atoms. That gives a simple relationship. Interatomic separations can be inferred using X-ray diffraction or suitable spectroscopic methods. The halving rule should not be applied blindly to a bond between two different elements, whose contributions need not be equal.
Problem
The internuclear distance in a chlorine molecule is 198 pm. Find the single-bond covalent radius.
- 1.The two bonded atoms are identical, so divide the separation equally.
- 2..
- 3.The result describes chlorine in the specified covalent situation, not a sharply bounded isolated sphere.
Problem
Two neighbouring copper atoms in the metal are separated by 256 pm. Find the metallic radius in pm and metres.
- 1.Half the equal-atom separation is .
- 2.Using , the radius is .
- 3.In standard scientific notation this is .
Why atomic radii change across and down the table
Across a main-group period, electrons are added to the same outer shell while the number of protons increases. Inner electrons screen part of the nuclear attraction, but their number does not rise enough to cancel the added nuclear charge. The outer cloud is pulled in more strongly, so the radius generally decreases.
Shielding, or screening, is the reduction in nuclear attraction experienced by an electron because of other electrons. Effective nuclear charge is the net positive attraction experienced after that screening is considered. It is not simply the formal charge on an ion.
| Period 2 element | Li | Be | B | C | N | O | F |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Atomic radius / pm | 152 | 111 | 88 | 77 | 74 | 66 | 64 |
| Period 3 element | Na | Mg | Al | Si | P | S | Cl |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Atomic radius / pm | 186 | 160 | 143 | 117 | 110 | 104 | 99 |
Down a group, an additional occupied shell places the valence electrons farther from the nucleus. More inner electrons provide more shielding. Although the nucleus has more protons too, the added shell and shielding dominate the main-group size trend, so atomic radius increases.
| Group 1 | Radius / pm | Group 17 | Radius / pm |
|---|---|---|---|
| Li | 152 | F | 64 |
| Na | 186 | Cl | 99 |
| K | 231 | Br | 114 |
| Rb | 244 | I | 133 |
| Cs | 262 | At | 140 |
Noble gases require special care in size comparisons. Their quoted non-bonded, or van der Waals, radii come from atoms that are not joined by an ordinary covalent bond. These values are often much larger than neighbouring covalent radii. Comparing unlike radius conventions can create a false break in the trend. Radius values also vary somewhat with bonding and structural environment.
A larger atomic number does not always mean a larger atom. Across a period it usually means a smaller main-group atom; down a group it usually means a larger atom. First identify the direction of comparison and use comparable radius definitions.
Turning atoms into ions
Electron loss creates a cation and electron gain creates an anion, but neither process changes the nucleus. A cation has fewer electrons sharing the same nuclear attraction, and sometimes loses the outer shell entirely. An anion has more electron repulsion in the cloud. Consequently a cation is normally smaller than its parent atom, while an anion is larger.
| Comparison | Parent atom radius / pm | Ion radius / pm | Interpretation |
|---|---|---|---|
| Na and | 186 | 95 | Electron loss contracts the cloud |
| F and | 64 | 136 | Electron gain expands the cloud |
Ionic radii are inferred from ion separations in crystals, with a convention for sharing those distances. They depend on charge and coordination environment, so different valid tables can assign somewhat different values. Use a consistent dataset for a numerical comparison; the robust ideas here concern direction and electron count.
Atoms or ions with the same number of electrons. For example, , , Ne, , and each contain ten electrons. They need not have the same nuclear charge or the same radius.
For an isoelectronic sequence, the electron count is held constant while proton number changes. More protons pull the same electron population more strongly, producing a smaller species. Always compare nuclear charge, rather than memorising separate and potentially confusing rules for the signs of anions and cations.
Problem
Arrange , , , , , and in increasing radius.
- 1.Count electrons: , , , , , and all give ten.
- 2.Their nuclear charges rise from 7 for nitrogen to 13 for aluminium.
- 3.With the same electron count, radius decreases as nuclear charge increases.
- 4.The increasing-radius order is .
Problem
Among Mg, , Al, and , identify the largest and smallest species.
- 1.Across period 3, neutral Mg is larger than neutral Al.
- 2.Each cation is smaller than its corresponding neutral atom, so neutral Mg is largest.
- 3. and each have ten electrons; aluminium has the greater nuclear charge, so is smaller.
- 4.Thus Mg is the largest and the smallest. The isoelectronic rule applies to the two ions, not indiscriminately to all four species.
Quiz
Why does atomic radius need an operational definition?
A single bond between two identical atoms is 150 pm long. What is each covalent radius?
Why does atomic size generally decrease across a main-group period?
Which pair is isoelectronic?
Which is smallest in the ten-electron series , , , ?
Why can a noble-gas radius appear unexpectedly large beside a halogen radius?
Practice Problems
- Explain why atomic radius is not the radius of a hard sphere.
- An equal-atom bond distance is 242 pm. Calculate the corresponding covalent radius in pm and metres.
- Explain the opposite size trends across period 3 and down Group 1.
- Give one ten-electron species isoelectronic with and one eighteen-electron species isoelectronic with Ar.
- Find a species isoelectronic with and explain your electron count.
- Explain why is smaller than Na and larger than F without changing the number of protons.
- Rank , , and by radius and identify the controlled variable in your comparison.
Key Takeaways
Atomic radii are inferred from interatomic distances and depend on the chosen convention. Across a main-group period increasing effective nuclear attraction usually contracts the atom; down a group additional shells enlarge it. Cations are normally smaller and anions larger than their parent atoms. For isoelectronic species, a larger nuclear charge gives a smaller radius. Compare radii using consistent definitions and structural environments.