Skip to lesson content

Lesson 5 of 5

We Distribute, Yet Things Multiply · Lesson 5 of 5

Chapter Summary and Practice

“Revise the chapter, solve mixed problems and investigate the Coin Conjoin puzzle.”

Learning Objectives

• Recall the distributive property, product changes and the three main identities. • Select and explain a suitable method for a mixed problem. • Check signs, like terms, overlap and the meaning of an expression. • Connect equivalent algebraic expressions with counting and area models. • Invert triangular coin arrangements and justify minimum moves in the smaller cases.

A few weeks after learning a method, it is easy to remember the formula but forget why it works. This lesson brings the chapter back together. You will move from multiplying parts to recognising special products, checking arguments and interpreting patterns. The aim is to make a sensible choice when a question does not tell you which identity to use. You should also be able to explain each important step to another student.

Begin by trying to recall the main ideas without looking at the formulas. What must an outside factor multiply? Why does a squared sum have a middle term? How can two different expressions count the same pattern? Use the recap to fill any gaps, then attempt the worked examples and mixed questions.

The closing coin puzzle asks a related question in a different setting: how can you rearrange something while preserving as much of it as possible? Finding a short solution is one achievement. Explaining why no shorter solution can work requires an additional argument.

Summary

Distribution means multiplying every signed term. For example, 7(20 + 3) = 7 × 20 + 7 × 3. The same reasoning applies to subtraction and to expressions with more than two terms. With two brackets, every term in one bracket must meet every term in the other.

An identity is an equality true for every allowed value of its letters. A valid expansion establishes an identity because each step preserves the value generally. Substitution is useful for catching mistakes, but several matching examples are still only checks. A single mismatch is enough to show that a claimed identity is false.

Distribution and two bracketsLaTeX

When ab becomes (a + m)(b + n), the new product is ab + an + bm + mn. Subtract ab to find the change an + bm + mn. Negative increments describe decreases. Do not assume the change is positive just because one or both factors have increased.

When both factors increase by 1, the change is a + b + 1. When the first increases by 1 and the second decreases by 1, it is b − a − 1. The extra product of the increments accounts for the corner in an area model. Forgetting it is the same kind of error as omitting a region from a diagram.

SituationUseful expressionWhat to watch
General product change(a + m)(b + n) − ab = an + bm + mnInclude the product mn of the increments.
Sum squared(a + b)² = a² + 2ab + b²Both mixed products are present.
Difference squared(a − b)² = a² − 2ab + b²The last squared term remains positive.
Matching sum and difference(a + b)(a − b) = a² − b²The opposite mixed terms cancel.
Add the two squared brackets(a + b)² + (a − b)² = 2(a² + b²)Each square appears twice.

The three main identities are special cases of distribution. A square of a sum has two rectangles of area ab alongside its two squares. A square of a difference can be calculated by removing two strips and restoring their overlap once. A difference of squares can be rearranged into a rectangle whose sides are the sum and difference of the original sides.

The pictures use positive lengths. The algebraic proofs apply more widely, including negative integers and fractions. Treat a whole term such as 6x or 3z/4 as one part when substituting: (6x)² = 36x² and (3z/4)² = 9z²/16. Squaring changes both the coefficient and the variable power.

Recognise the brackets before choosing a ruleSame sum twice: (a + b)(a + b)Keep both mixed products: +2abSame difference twice: (a − b)(a − b)Keep both mixed products: −2abMatching pair: (a + b)(a − b)Opposite mixed products cancel
Three bracket structures and the behaviour of their mixed terms

Like terms have the same variables with the same powers. Thus 2a²b + 5ba² = 7a²b, but a²b + ab² remains a sum of unlike terms. Reordering factors does not change a term; changing powers does. A long expansion should first show every product and only then collect matching terms.

This also explains larger expressions. Distributing (a + b)(a² + 2ab + b²) and collecting like terms gives a³ + 3a²b + 3ab² + b³. In products such as (a − b)(a² + ab + b²), the interior terms cancel, leaving a³ − b³. Both results use the same basic property, even though they contain higher powers.

Fast multiplication uses convenient splits. Multiply by 11 using 10N + N, by 101 using 100N + N, and by 1001 using 1000N + N. Keep place values aligned and carry as needed. Multiplication by 99 or 999 uses 100N − N or 1000N − N.

For mental squares, choose a nearby convenient number and use a squared sum or difference. For products equally spaced from a common centre, use a difference of squares. You can also rearrange that identity as a² = (a + b)(a − b) + b² to turn a square into an easy product plus a small correction.

What you noticeA method worth tryingExample
One factor near a power of tenSplit the factor and distributeN × 999 = 1000N − N
One number squared near a convenient valueSquare of a sum or difference99² = (100 − 1)²
Two factors equally spaced from a centreDifference of squares98 × 102 = 100² − 2²
A complicated bracket patternOrdinary distribution(p − 1)(p + 11)
Two forms for the same countExpand both and comparek(k + 2) = (k + 1)² − 1
Choose between two mental methods

Problem
Find 397 × 403 and 91², explaining why the methods differ.

  1. 1.The factors 397 and 403 are 400 − 3 and 400 + 3. Their product is 400² − 3² = 160000 − 9 = 159991.
  2. 2.The number 91 is repeated in the square, so use (90 + 1)² = 8100 + 180 + 1 = 8281.
  3. 3.Alternatively, (100 − 9)² = 10000 − 1800 + 81 = 8281. Both squared forms work, but the split 90 + 1 makes the arithmetic shorter.
  4. 4.The product of opposite-offset brackets cancels its mixed terms; two identical brackets do not.
A minus sign outside a product

Problem
Expand −(2y + 5)(3y + 4).

  1. 1.First expand the bracket product: 6y² + 8y + 15y + 20.
  2. 2.Collect like terms to get 6y² + 23y + 20.
  3. 3.Now apply the outside minus sign to every term: −6y² − 23y − 20.
  4. 4.At y = 0, the original is −(5 × 4) = −20, agreeing with the constant term. Changing only the first sign would be incorrect.
Keep ordinary products and distribution distinct

Problem
Expand (7p)(3r)(p + 2).

  1. 1.The first two factors are multiplied: (7p)(3r) = 21pr. There is no addition between them to distribute over.
  2. 2.Now distribute 21pr over p + 2: 21pr × p + 21pr × 2.
  3. 3.The result is 21p²r + 42pr. These terms have different powers of p and cannot be combined by adding coefficients.

In a pattern problem, identify the stage variable and describe the pieces before writing a formula. The missing-corner circle pattern has k(k + 2) = k² + 2k = (k + 1)² − 1 circles. A one-tile border around an n by n hole has (n + 2)² − n² = 4n + 4 tiles.

The yellow stepped pattern has y(y + 2) + 2(y + 2) = (y + 2)² tiles. The blue pattern has (y + 1)² + y tiles. A sequence of totals alone is not a complete explanation: the arrangement shows why each term belongs.

Area methods may subtract known pieces from a whole or directly multiply the sides of what remains. Four m by n rectangles inside a square give the central area (m + n)² − 4mn = (n − m)². Three x by y rectangles in the other arrangement leave x² − xy = x(x − y). For two crossing removed strips, add the overlap once to correct double subtraction.

Prove that two area expressions agree

Problem
Show that (p − r)(s − r) and ps − pr − sr + r² are equivalent.

  1. 1.Distribute p and −r over the second bracket: ps − pr − rs + r².
  2. 2.Because rs = sr, this is exactly ps − pr − sr + r².
  3. 3.The product form uses the two remaining side lengths. The expanded form starts with the whole rectangle, subtracts two strips and corrects the overlap.
  4. 4.For p = 8, s = 11 and r = 2, the product gives 6 × 9 = 54, while the expanded form gives 88 − 16 − 22 + 4 = 54 square units.

Algebra can prove relationships that a few numerical examples only suggest. In a calendar block, (a + 1)(a + 7) − a(a + 8) = 7. For three consecutive integers n − 1, n, n + 1, the middle square exceeds the outer product by 1.

An even integer 2t has square 4t². An odd integer 2t + 1 has square 4t(t + 1) + 1; because one of t and t + 1 is even, this is 1 more than a multiple of 8. If A and B have remainders 3 and 5 on division by 7, their sum and product each have remainder 1. A − B has remainder 5, whereas B − A has remainder 2.

Language and dimensions deserve the same care as signs. “Two more than a square” is s² + 2, and “half the square of a sum” is (a + b)²/2. In the two-lawn park layout, outer margins w and a central gap 2w give tiled area 8w(g + w). A different central gap would change the expression.

A final check before accepting an answer

Ask whether every product is present, every sign is correct, every combined term has matching powers, and every counted part appears exactly once. For a numerical result, estimate its size. For an area, include square units. For an “always” statement, give an algebraic reason or find a counterexample.

It’s Puzzle Time!

Place equal coins at equally spaced points in an upright triangle. A triangle with two rows contains 1 + 2 = 3 coins, one with three rows contains 6, and one with four rows contains 10. The next triangle has five rows and 15 coins.

You may pick up one coin and place it at a new position; this counts as one move. Keep all coins, keep the same spacing in the completed triangle, and make it point downward. The final triangle may be shifted on the table. You are not required to keep its outline in the original location.

Coin Conjoin

Before moving anything, imagine the final downward triangle lying over the original one. Every position shared by both triangles can keep its coin. Only coins outside the shared positions need to move to new positions. Therefore a good strategy is to seek the greatest overlap.

For 3 coins, move the top coin to a position below the centre of the bottom pair. The pair becomes the top row of a downward triangle. Exactly one coin moves. Zero moves cannot change the orientation, so one is minimal.

For 6 coins, keep the top coin, the two coins in the middle row, and the centre coin of the bottom row. Move the two end coins of the bottom row to the left and right of the top coin, at the same spacing. The final rows contain 3, 2 and 1 coins. At most four positions can overlap for this size, so two moves are necessary as well as sufficient.

Invert ten coins in three moves

Problem
Turn a four-row triangle of 10 coins upside down.

  1. 1.Keep the two coins in the second row, all three coins in the third row, and the middle two coins in the bottom row. These seven coins remain in place.
  2. 2.Move the left and right end coins from the original bottom row to extend the original second row, one at each end. That row now contains four coins.
  3. 3.Move the original top coin below the centre of the original bottom row, at the next row spacing.
  4. 4.The completed downward rows contain 4, 3, 2 and 1 coins. Exactly three coins moved. In the diagram, B and C move to extend the upper row, and A moves to the bottom.
Ten coins: three movesBeforeBACAfterBACMove each letter to its matching letter; green coins stay.
Ten coins: three moves

Why can two moves not be enough? It would require eight coins to stay in place. Compare the original row lengths 1, 2, 3, 4 with the downward row lengths 4, 3, 2, 1. For any vertical shift, the shared coins in a row cannot exceed the shorter of the two rows.

The best row alignment puts the four-coin target row level with the original two-coin row. The row limits are then 2, 3 and 2, totalling 7. Other vertical alignments give limits of at most 6. A horizontal shift cannot increase any row beyond its shorter row length. Therefore at most seven coins stay and at least three must move. The construction achieves that limit.

The next larger triangle

Problem
Invert a five-row triangle of 15 coins using five moves.

  1. 1.The original rows contain 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5 coins. Keep all coins in rows three and four, and keep the middle three coins in row five. This keeps 3 + 4 + 3 = 10 coins.
  2. 2.Move the five remaining coins into these empty positions: two ends extending original row three to five coins, a new two-coin row below original row five, and a final single coin below that.
  3. 3.The target rows now contain 5, 4, 3, 2 and 1 coins, so the triangle points downward.
  4. 4.Five moves are sufficient. To establish minimality, we must also show that more than ten positions cannot be shared.
Fifteen coins: five movesBeforeDBACEAfterACEDBMove each letter to its matching letter; green coins stay.
Fifteen coins: five moves
Why five moves are minimal

This argument assumes equal row spacing and an exactly inverted triangle of the same size. If any coins stay, a row of the target must align with a row of the original. In each aligned row, the overlap is no larger than the shorter row. The table lists these row-count upper bounds for all shifts that could share a row. Their maximum is 10, so at least 15 − 10 = 5 coins must move. The five-move arrangement above reaches that bound.

Shift of target top row from original topLargest overlap allowed by row counts
4 rows up1
3 rows up2
2 rows up4
1 row up6
Same height9
1 row down10
2 rows down10
3 rows down8
4 rows down5

For example, shift the target top row two rows down. Its rows of 5, 4 and 3 coins meet original rows of 3, 4 and 5 coins. The limits are 3, 4 and 3, totalling 10. The two remaining target rows have no original coins beneath them. Shifting farther than four rows leaves no shared row at all.

The distinction is important: a construction shows that a particular number of moves is possible; the overlap limit shows that fewer moves are impossible. Together, they establish a minimum. The same distinction appears in algebra when a numerical check suggests a claim and a general argument proves it.

Explore larger triangular arrangements

Try triangles with 6 and 7 rows. Count the coins first, then slide an imagined downward triangle over the original to maximise overlap. Look for a relationship between the total coins and the minimum moves.

Six rows have 21 coins and seven rows have 28. Their best row-count overlap limits are 14 and 19, achieved by suitable placements, giving 7 and 9 moves respectively. For six rows, shift the target one row down without a horizontal shift: the shared row counts are 2, 3, 4, 3, 2. For seven rows, shift the target two rows down: the shared counts are 3, 4, 5, 4, 3. Along with totals 3, 6, 10 and 15 requiring 1, 2, 3 and 5 moves, these cases suggest taking the number of complete groups of three coins in the total. Treat this as a conjecture for arbitrary sizes until you develop an argument covering all sizes; the listed cases alone do not prove a general rule.

Quiz

Quick check

Which calculation needs a middle term that does not cancel?

Quick check

If ab changes to (a + 2)(b + 3), what is the change?

Quick check

Which best proves two expressions are equivalent?

Quick check

A fifteen-coin triangle can keep at most ten coins in place when inverted. What does this tell you?

Quick check

Which statement about 5w² + 6w = 11w² is correct?

Answer: (x + 4)². Identical brackets give two equal mixed products. Matching sum-and-difference brackets give opposite mixed products.

Practice Problems

Practice Problems
  1. Expand (p − 1)(p + 11) and (6x + 5y)².
  2. Calculate 46², 43 × 45 and 234 × 101 with suitable methods.
  3. The product 18 × 22 changes to 20 × 19. Find the change using the increments, then check directly.
  4. Prove that the square of the middle of three consecutive integers exceeds the product of the outer two by 1. Then illustrate the claim using a negative middle integer.
  5. Describe a five-move solution for the 15-coin triangle and explain what additional argument establishes that it is minimal.

First: p² + 11p − p − 11 = p² + 10p − 11. Second: (6x)² + 2 × 6x × 5y + (5y)² = 36x² + 60xy + 25y². The first uses four ordinary products; the second has two identical mixed products.

Key Takeaways

Key Takeaways

• Distribution is the common reason behind product changes, special identities and mental shortcuts. • Choose a method by inspecting the whole bracket structure, including signs and coefficients. • Like terms match in variables and powers; a squared sum or difference includes mixed products. • Equivalent expressions often describe different ways to count or measure the same arrangement. • Check overlap, corner counting, dimensions and subtraction order as carefully as arithmetic. • A numerical example checks a case; algebra or a complete counting argument establishes a general conclusion. • For the coin puzzle, preserve shared positions: a construction and an overlap bound together prove a minimum.