Natural Selection Observed: Moths and Resistance

Peppered moths and background-dependent survival

Peppered moth populations contain differently pigmented inherited variants. Historical industrial pollution darkened bark and reduced pale lichen growth in some habitats. On darker surfaces, darker moths were often less conspicuous to predators; on lighter backgrounds, pale forms could gain the advantage. Over generations local proportions changed, consistent with background-dependent selection.

The soot did not genetically turn individual moths dark. Instead, differences were already present, and birds sometimes removed more conspicuous moths before breeding. Cleaner conditions later favoured different proportions in many places. Predation, resting behaviour, migration and sampling need consideration, so the explanation is about probabilities and reproductive descendants, not deterministic survival of every dark moth.

The four causal links in a selection explanation

First establish heritable variation: different alleles can influence pigmentation. Second identify selection pressure: predation in a particular visual setting. Third measure unequal success: one variant may produce more offspring. Fourth evaluate the outcome: inherited variant frequency changes in subsequent generations. These steps form the explanation for evolution, rather than the mere observation that two environments contain different numbers of moths.

Suppose darker moths increase from 25 percent to 65 percent over several generations in a polluted woodland. This change is consistent with selection, but not conclusive proof on its own. Migration, random drift or changed sampling could also affect the count. Ecological observations and experiments can test whether camouflage-related predation drives the result.

How antibiotic resistance evolves

A bacterial population may already contain resistant variants due to mutation or genes acquired from other bacteria through horizontal transfer. Drug treatment strongly reduces susceptible cells while resistant lineages may continue multiplying. The population sampled later therefore contains a higher fraction of resistance determinants. Antibiotics provide a selective environment; bacteria do not invent a chosen resistance gene because they are consciously attempting to survive.

Resistance mechanisms vary: a bacterium may alter a drug target, chemically inactivate a drug, reduce uptake or pump it out. The genetic determinants can be costly in a drug-free environment, though their costs vary. This is why a simple statement that resistant bacteria are always superior is wrong. Rapid generation times let microbial allele frequencies change detectably over short intervals.

Human-driven evolution and sound inference

Similar principles apply to insecticide-resistant insects and herbicide-resistant weeds. Repeated chemical exposure can favour variants that survive or detoxify the compound. These cases are often called human-driven evolutionary changes because people alter selection pressures, but the underlying population-genetic logic is still natural selection. No new species needs to appear before evolution can be measured.

A robust comparison measures starting genotype composition, treatment exposure, reproduction and changes across generations. A moth temporarily stained by soot has undergone a physical change, not inherited evolution. A migration-driven frequency shift may be evolutionary but is not necessarily evidence for selection. The biological explanation must identify which mechanisms are supported by observations.

Quick Quiz

Practice Problems